FINANCIAL FRAUDSTER NEWS INVESTIGATIONS EXCLUSIVE
JUDICIAL INTEGRITY IN CRISIS: Three High Court Judges Accused of Biased Rulings, Legal Fraud to Link Vexatious Litigant to Proceedings He Had No Involvement With
London, UK – In a hard-hitting expose that strikes at the heart of the British judiciary, a Financial Fraudster News Investigations exclusive can today reveal a shocking chain of events involving three senior High Court judges.
In their apparent haste to link a vexatious litigant, Laslo Gold-Cadd [not his real name], to legal proceedings he was not a party to, these judges allegedly ignored fundamental legal principles, made verifiably false findings, and issued unlawful rulings that are now the subject of a fresh legal challenge.
The case, which centers on a property dispute involving a claimant identified in court as Cheryl Plummer LP, reveals a system so focused on a pre-determined narrative that it has allegedly perpetuated a fraud on the court.
The Unlawful Orders: Judges Act Against the Law
The controversy began when Master Davison issued an order on 19 March 2024, staying the execution of a lawful writ of possession against criminal trespasser Stephen Flattery. The reason given was that "it appearing that issue of the writ of possession herein may have been procured by fraud" based on "information provided to the court from Hertfordshire Police".
However, the legal situation deteriorated further under Master Sullivan. In her order dated 17 April 2024, she revoked the writ of possession on her "own motion". The stated reason was a demonstrably false premise: that "no evidence has been filed that the order of 4 November 2021 was served on the defendant". This finding is directly contradicted by court records that show two Certificates of Service were filed on the court's CE File system on 27 October 2021 and 19 November 2021.
The Final Judgment: Unjustified Findings by Mr Justice Miles
The judicial misconduct reached a critical point with Mr Justice Miles. In his judgment dated 28 May 2025, he upheld Master Sullivan's fraudulent order, dismissing the claimant's evidence as "manifestly incredible".
The judgment contained a series of deeply flawed and damaging findings that reveal an alleged preoccupation with linking the case to Laslo Gold-Cadd:
Fabricated Criminal Link: The judgment falsely stated that Laslo Gold-Cadd was facing a criminal trial in September 2025. This has since been confirmed as false by Cambridge Crown Court staff.
Baseless Conflation: Mr Justice Miles explicitly conflated the name "Gottlieb Cohen Family Foundation" with "Gold-Cadd," stating, "it is simply not credible to state that the GC in 'GC Family Foundation' refers to anything other than 'Gold-Cadd'". This misattribution was made despite a wealth of evidence demonstrating the Foundation is a legitimate entity, unrelated to Laslo Gold-Cadd.
Dismissal of Valid Evidence: The judge dismissed a £1.42 billion investment by the Gottlieb Cohen Family Foundation into Distressed Debt Xchange Group LLP as "not remotely credible". This finding shows a shocking ignorance of the private international distressed debt markets and a willingness to substitute personal opinion for verifiable evidence.
The Legal Fraud: A Limited Partnership Without a Voice
The entire legal foundation of these proceedings is now being challenged. The claimant's representative, Thierry Feraud, has highlighted a fundamental and unaddressed legal error: a Limited Partnership (LP) has no legal personality to bring proceedings. Consequently, all orders made against the claimant, Cheryl Plummer LP, are legally "null and void". The failure of Masters Sullivan and Davison and Mr Justice Miles to establish this critical fact, despite presiding over multiple hearings, has perpetuated a fraud on the court.
Furthermore, a leaked email from DS Anna Luxon to Stephen Flattery reveals a brazen attempt to pervert the course of justice by conspiring to provide false information to the court. The email instructed Flattery on how to mislead a High Court judge and explicitly suggested he mention that Laslo Gold-Cadd is a "vexatious litigant" to prejudice the case.
A Call for Accountability
This investigation paints a damning picture of a judiciary so preoccupied with connecting a vexatious litigant to a case he was not legitimately linked to that it has been blindsided by its own biases. The result has been a series of unlawful rulings that are a direct attack on the integrity of the British legal system and have caused significant harm to legitimate businesses. The claimant, Cheryl Plummer (International) LLC, is now taking legal action to declare the orders null and void and to hold the judges accountable for their conduct.
For further inquiries, contact:
Financial Fraudster News Investigations Team
@FraudsterNews or @therealfinancialfraudsternews or @the_real_FFN
Related Articles:
A Crisis of Judicial Integrity: How Two Senior Judges Were Caught in a Compromising Position
