FINANCIAL FRAUDSTER NEWS INVESTIGATIONS EXCLUSIVE: JCIO Launches Review of "Unhinged" Judge's Ruling Amid "Bogus" False Statements; USA "Taking an Interest" in UK Court's Theft Complicity
LONDON, UK – Financial Fraudster News can exclusively confirm that the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) is now formally reviewing the conduct and "bogus decision" of His Honour Judge Nicholas Parfitt [Pictured below].
The review, filed under complaint number 49510/25, was lodged this morning by the US-based Gottlieb Cohen Foundation.
It alleges that the judge's written reasons are a tissue of false statements designed to justify a "sham hearing" that has led to one of the worst days in British legal history.
The JCIO complaint deconstructs the judge's ruling, accusing him of a "wholesale adoption of the Intervener's (GDUK's) false narrative" and relying on "secret evidence" to facilitate the theft of a multi-million-pound American asset.
The "world is now watching", as FFN sources confirm the United States is "taking an interest" in the "complicit acts" of GDUK, their "Magic Circle" lawyers Freshfields LLP, and a UK judiciary that appears, to many, to be compromised.
A Sham Hearing Built on "False Statements"
The JCIO complaint, which FFN has reviewed, alleges HHJ Parfitt's conduct was not a simple error but a deliberate adoption of a false narrative, which he presented as fact in his Written Reasons.
The judge, who "considered" the evidence bundle before the hearing, proceeded to ignore all evidence that contradicted the Freshfields narrative.
1. THE FALSEHOOD: The "Lack of Jurisdiction" Lie
The Judge's "Bogus" Reason: HHJ Parfitt ruled that the County Court had "no jurisdiction" because the case was well outside the county court limit of £350,000, calling the claim a £3,000 small claim "vehicle" .
THE FACT: This is a demonstrable falsehood. The judge knew this was a valid claim. The Claim Form (K0QZ48AX) in his bundle clearly states the "Amount claimed" is £3,000.00. The judge deliberately and dishonestly conflated the claim value with the settlement remedy to invent a jurisdictional failure.
2. THE FALSEHOOD: The "Incredible" Prisoner Alibi
The Judge's "Bogus" Reason: The judge ruled the claim was an "abuse of process" and a "nullity" because it was filed by Mr. Lionel Godfrey-Collins (LGC) [Not his real name] in breach of a Civil Proceedings Order (CPO) . He dismissed LGC's sworn statement as "incredible" .
THE FACT: The judge's finding is physically impossible. The evidence he "considered" proved his finding was a lie:
The LGC Witness Statement (Tab 18) provided a sworn, verifiable alibi that Mr. Godfrey-Collins was IN PRISON from 2013 until March 2025 .
The Claim Form (Tab 19) was filed in December 2023 (while LGC was incarcerated) and signed by a US lawyer, "X Davidson (Asst Gen Counsel)" .
The judge knew the alibi was true and called it "incredible" to justify his ruling.
3. THE FALSEHOOD: The "Secret Evidence"
The Judge's "Bogus" Reason: The judge's entire case for "no consent" rested on a "secret" letter from... solicitors for the State of Libya dated 12 November 2025 (i.e., the SPB letter).
THE FACT: The judge used this "secret evidence," which the absent parties could not rebut, to ignore a decade of established court-verified facts in his own bundle. He "considered" and then ignored:
The 2010 notarized Power of Attorney (Tab 4) giving PCP the explicit right "to... confess, compromise or settle all claims."
The 2016 DDJ Emerson Order (Tab 10) , a prior UK court ruling that already confirmed the POA was valid and had no evidence... of any revocation.
The World Is Watching
This is the "complicit act" the USA is now "taking an interest" in.
This was not an error. It was a "procedural ambush" where Freshfields LLP engineered a 48-hour "sham hearing" to block a US entity from attending.
The "unhinged" judge then completed the conspiracy, ignoring all written evidence and using "secret," unrebutted evidence to justify a "bogus decision" that achieved the "theft" GDUK and its lawyers intended all along.
The JCIO review is the last hope for the British legal system to prove it is not a "sham" where justice is for sale to the highest bidder
For further inquiries, contact:
Financial Fraudster News Investigations
Now on X: @FraudsterNews, @therealfinancialfraudsternews or @the_real_FFN
Related Article:
